The 14th Amendment and the Incorporation Doctrine by David BennerAmericans often describe their rights in terms of numbers derived from amendments in the federal Bill of Rights, an unambiguous set of limitations on government. Despite this tendency, most do not realize that such amendments were never designed to inhibit local authorities. Nevertheless, during the Progressive Era the federal courts began to claim that the 14th Amendment had
Skip to Main Content - Keyboard Accessible
The doctrine of incorporation is the process by which most of the guarantees in the Bill of Rights in the U. Constitution are applied to the states. The Bill of Rights guarantees basic liberties, such as the right of free speech, religion, and press, the right to bear arms, and others contained in the first 10 amendments to the Constitution. The U. Supreme Court began interpreting the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution, with the reasoning that certain rights are so fundamental that they are necessary to due process guaranteed to citizens and made applicable to states through the Fourteenth Amendment. Today, selective incorporation exists, applying the First Amendment rights, Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable search and seizure, Sixth Amendment criminal due process rights, and the Fifth Amendment's protection against self-incrimination and required compensation for government takings to states. However, the Second Amendment right to bear arms, the Third Amendment ban against quartering troops, the Fifth Amendment right to indictment by a grand jury, and the Seventh Amendment right to a jury in civil cases have not been extended to states.
Incorporation is a legal doctrine applied by the U. This means the same limitations which apply to laws written and executed at the federal level must also be observed by lower level governments. - The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case involving a display of the Ten Commandments on government property. The case is McCreary County v.
Community legislation. The doctrine that rules of international law automatically form part of municipal law. It is opposed to the doctrine of transformation, which states that international law only forms a part of municipal law if accepted as such by statute or judicial decisions. It is not altogether clear which view English law takes with respect to rules of customary international law. As far as international treaties are concerned, the sovereign has the power to make or ratify treaties so as to bind England under international law, but these treaties have no effect in municipal law with the exception of treaties governing the conduct of war until enacted by Parliament. However, judges will sometimes consider provisions of international treaties e. It has been said that directives of the European Community have the force of law in member states, but practice varies widely see Community legislation.
A constitutional doctrine whereby selected provisions of the Bill of Rights are made applicable to the states through the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The doctrine of selective incorporation, or simply the incorporation doctrine, makes the first ten amendments to the Constitution—known as the Bill of Rights—binding on the states. Through incorporation, state governments largely are held to the same standards as the federal government with regard to many constitutional rights, including the First Amendment freedoms of speech, religion, and assembly, and the separation of church and state; the Fourth Amendment freedoms from unwarranted arrest and unreasonable searches and seizures ; the fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination ; and the Sixth Amendment right to a speedy, fair, and public trial. Some provisions of the Bill of Rights—including the requirement of indictment by a Grand Jury Sixth Amendment and the right to a jury trial in civil cases Seventh Amendment —have not been applied to the states through the incorporation doctrine. Until the early twentieth century, the Bill of Rights was interpreted as applying only to the federal government. In the case Barron ex rel. Tiernon v.